When lululemon CEO Laurent Potdevin departed the apparel maker on Monday, it was made to look as if the departure had been voluntary as the company announced that he had resigned his position. That’s despite the company issuing a statement that said he “fell short” of the company’s conduct standards.
Now shareholder’s rights groups are demanding to know if, in fact, the termination was as described, and why was the ousted CEO given a separation payment of US$5 million and agreed not to sue the company.
READ MORE: Lululemon CEO Laurent Potdevin resigns after he ‘fell short’ of company’s conduct standards
- TC Energy urges co-operation on growing natural gas network to meet ‘generational’ demand
- AI stocks drop as tech companies call to slow down development for safety
- Central Alberta carbon capture hub on track to be largest in Canada
- Enbridge makes US$2.55B acquisition of pipeline, storage systems in U.S. midwest
One shareholders’ rights law firm in the U.S. says the company’s statements border on the inadequate and that shareholders have a right to know the reasons,.
Get weekly money news
Canaccord Genuity analyst Camilo Lyon said Tuesday that the lululemon board had moved to quarantine the fallout that could have ensued had details been made public.
I’m expecting more to come on this file.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.