An expert on low-carbon transportation says the roughly 1,000 compressed natural gas buses running in Canada are still considered “extremely safe” after one such bus was involved in a deadly crash in Calgary that claimed the lives of three people.
On Thursday, a chain-reaction crash happened when a transit bus hit several vehicles before rear-ending a parked bus, igniting an explosion that also left more than a dozen others injured.
Calgary police said one officer was taken to the hospital with injuries after running towards a bus as fire erupted.
One of the 12-metre-long buses involved in the crash was powered by compressed natural gas, a kind of fuel considered cheaper and more environmentally friendly than diesel gas.
Buses that run on compressed natural gas are common in public transit and have been in operation for the past two decades, said Josipa Petrunic, president and CEO of Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium (CUTRIC), a national non-profit focused on low-carbon transit research and planning.
“It’s considered extremely safe technology, so we all need to find out what happened to create an unsafe environment in a crash situation,” Petrunic said.
Get breaking National news
There are 958 compressed natural gas-powered buses operating in Ontario, Alberta and B.C., according to a CUTRIC database report.
Petrunic said there are several heavy-duty safety mechanisms involved in building these buses, including a series of tools and technologies designed to manage leakage and reduce the risk of fire. Their tanks are also designed to withstand heavy impacts.
Usually, the most unsafe part of these buses, and any form of public transportation, is the lack of seatbelts, Petrunic said.
- ‘Local Governance 101’ Okanagan community’s first-ever council trains ahead of inaugural meeting
- Family of soldier badly burned at CFB Wainwright speaks about his injuries
- As B.C. scraps time change, experts have a warning about the risks
- B.C. soldier burned in CFB Wainwright fire remains in Edmonton ICU
A spokesperson from Nova Bus confirmed that it was the manufacturer of the bus that was rear-ended in Thursday’s crash and the company is in contact with Calgary Transit.
The spokesperson also said that it was “premature to speculate on the cause before a thorough investigation has been completed.”
“Safety remains Nova Bus’s highest priority, and we are offering our full cooperation to Calgary Transit and the relevant authorities as they work to establish the facts.“
Calgary Transit procures its buses from manufacturers that go through Altoona testing, a rigorous certification process for any new bus model to assess its durability and reliability before being rolled out into their fleet, said Petrunic.
The agency has nearly 250 CNG buses, which represents about 20 per cent of its fleet, according to the agency’s website. The website says the city plans to buy about 150 more this year to replace diesel buses.
As investigators continue to look into the cause of the crash, Petrunic said industry leaders will be looking into what factors went into the collision.
“A series of events had to have occurred in tandem for this cataclysmic event to occur leading to death,” said Petrunic. “A transit crash shouldn’t result in passenger deaths.”
Dis bus it has exploded only! Very dangerous this Calgary bus is. In India also we have many buses it safer to ride on roof but not exploding like this na. Every day I am taking bus for my work and always I am thinking something will happen. Why government is not checking properly? Too much overcrowding, old buses only. I am paying taxes, following all rules, but still my life is i danger. No safety at all this Calgary Transit
Let me correct that headline for you: “Expert”…
Please explain to me how one can build anything without the use of coal, oil and gas.
If this were an aircraft all of then would be pulled from service until
Such time as verification that there isn’t a specific unacceptable design failure isn’t present. In this case we’ll base “safety” on a nebulous “never been a problem before”? Rely less on talking heads and more on practical rigorous process, hey “media”?
They are safe because there hasn’t been a lot of accidents? But there are just a handful of natural gas vehicles on the road so of course the odds are for not a lot of accidents.
CNG is safe. The number of fuel accidents compared to mileage is extremely low. However to try to turn that into a comment on the design of that particular bus and whether it was correctly designed for rear end collisions is just a bit premature. Some busses have the tanks located under a side, as side impacts are more rare, some have them just in front of the rear bumper, as that is usually the strongest part of the frame.
extremely safe technology? Tell that to the poor souls who died and the ones who will suffer the restof there lives?
Sure doesn’t look “extremely safe” to me.
It was the operator.Likely shouldn’t have “binder” in the driver’s seat
Unless you are driving a malfunctioning bus with no brakes…it is hard to explain this series of collisions. Look at how bad the second bus frame looks after the incident. Totally destroyed compared to the one that caught fire.
9/10 times it’s operator error
not so safe for the 3 dead eh?
My common sense tells me that if a diesel truck had been involved, it wouldn’t have exploded. Natural gas can cause explosions. Diesel can cause fires.
Have any of your tools and technologies proven to be effective in an explosion? Obviously not.
Your comments on durability and reliability are unrelated to this accident. How would durability and reliability have prevented the multiple fatalities that occurred as a result of the explosion?
Please involve real experts to help prevent the loss of human lives and maintain citizens’ confidence in your product and in the safety of our roads.
Expert
Lmfao